Disabled voters in New York face substantial barriers to in-person voting
Justice Department settlement mandates only one accessible machine per county

By Kat Zambon
electionline.org

Despite a federal law that guarantees them a secret and independent ballot and a settlement between the state and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) over the implementation of that law, voters with disabilities in New York will face substantial barriers to casting in-person ballots when they go to the polls on Tuesday and again in November.

Those who choose to cast in-person ballots may have to travel great distances because, per the settlement with DOJ, the state need have only one accessible machine per county, and in New York City, one per borough.

New York lags behind the rest of the country in complying with the disability provisions of the Help America Vote Act of 2002, which require access to polling places as well as machines capable of allowing those with disabilities, including visual impairments to cast ballots “in a manner that provides the same opportunity for access and participation.”

Many activists as well as advocates for the disabled dismiss the plan as a waste of time and money and not effective in alleviating accessibility woes.

“Anyone who hears this plan immediately thinks it’s ridiculous,” said Chris Hildebrant, director of advocacy for the Center of Disability Rights in Rochester. “It’s not a plan at all.”

The plan is the result of a lawsuit filed by DOJ in March, citing the state for failing to adopt voting systems accessible for voter with disabilities.

The lawsuit threatened to revoke federal funds used in New York state elections if the state did not comply with HAVA requirements by the September primaries. Additionally, DOJ required New York to submit a plan on how it intends to gain full compliance.

On June 2, the court signed off on the state’s interim plan. According to Newsday, New York has thus far ordered 150 new voting machines targeted for disabled voters, costing as much as $5,000 apiece, in its implementation of “Plan B”. These machines, which aid disabled voters in completing paper ballots, will not likely be used past the fall.

“The Department of Justice’s rush to force the state to certify and buy computerized voting machines in time for the September primaries is a perfect storm for voting disaster,” said voting activist Larry Rockefeller in a press release by a coalition of people opposed to the lawsuit and its consequences. “These machines have failed all over the country in other jurisdictions and, under this time pressure, will definitely fail New Yorkers.”

New York’s need for an interim plan and temporary voting machines stems from its inability to follow HAVA’s proper timeline for replacing lever voting machines with newer ones.

"There was just no way at this late date that they could certify, we could pick the systems, and that we could have them up and going," Lynne Jones, the elections commissioner for Madison County, told the Oneida Daily Dispatch.

Though “Plan B” attempts to bring the state closer to HAVA compliance, many nonetheless feel that the solution contains large flaws.

Many disabled voters will not only have to travel beyond their local polling places, they will also have to leave their voting precinct to access the one machine in the county that caters to their voting needs.

In Hamilton County, disabled voters may have to travel approximately 45 minutes to utilize an accessible voting machine, said the county’s election office. However, transportation to and from the polling place will be provided.

“With this setup, they have really managed to please nobody and upset everybody," said Hildebrant.

While it may take 30 to 40 minutes to get to an accessible poll in Monroe County using private transportation, Hildebrant said that it could take well over an hour for people relying on public transportation.

Privacy violations are also among the growing list of complaints. Only disabled voters will utilize the new machines, thus determining how the cohort vote is simple.

While state officials acknowledge some of the “Plan B’s” flaws, they view it overall in a positive light.

“Is this a good solution?” said Lee Daghlian, spokesman for the state Board of Elections. "Not really the best. But under the circumstances and the timelines with HAVA, it's probably the best (counties) can do at this point."

The “best” solution for the Board of Elections still does not comfort Hildebrant over the negative effect the set-up will have on disabled voters.

“A horrible weakness about this plan is that it puts a pessimistic demeanor in people,” said Hildebrant.

New York’s primary election will be held Sept. 12, while the general election will take place on Nov. 7.

II. Election Reform News This Week

§ The United States Election Assistance Commission continues to seek public comment on the draft of the 2006 Election Administration and Voting Survey (formerly known as the Election Day Survey). The Survey is an important tool for collecting data which will inform the EAC's work on the Help America Vote Act, the National Voter Registration Act, and other national election matters. The EAC's webpage for the survey is here, with links to the draft survey and the Federal Register notice formally announcing the request for comments. Comments are due September 29, 2006.

§ The fight to make Georgia one of only a handful of states to require identification from all voters on Election Day started anew late last week when the State Board of Elections decided to begin a voter education campaign about the new law. Election board members argued that the federal ruling halting the implementation of the law only applied to the July primary and that with a special election on Sept. 19 and the general election in November fast approaching that an education campaign was necessary. “That photo ID law is in effect, so there’s no ambiguity” among voters and elections officials, board member Randy Evans told the Atlanta-Journal Constitution. Groups opposing the voter ID law reacted immediately to the board’s decision to move forward by saying they would once again pursue the matter in court.

§ Thousands of registered voters in the District of Columbia received voting guides in the mail late last week in anticipation of Sept. 12 primary. In addition to all the typical voting guide information on ballot format and candidate bios, the guides also provided voters with a helpful reminder of their polling place location. Problem is, the precinct number on many of those guides was incorrect. The D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics is blaming the problem on the printer who produced the guides. D.C. Councilmember Jim Graham (D), who is running for re-election, has vowed to launch an investigation into how the problem occurred in the first place. In the mean time, the D.C. BOEE will be sending out postcards to all registered voters with the correct precinct information.

§ It wasn’t a completely glitch-free primary in Florida as problems with touch-screen machines in several counties delayed election results. Although there were reports in Volusia County of voters getting the wrong ballots on their touch-screen machines, most of the reported problems with the machines came after the polls had closed and officials began the task of tallying the votes. Problems ranged from transmission issues from polling places to the slow rate of tallying the votes. In addition to the reporting problems with the new machines, a new Florida law that requires official election results to include precinct-by-precinct breakdowns for early, absentee and election-day voting also slowed down the process. A spokesman for the state Division of Elections told the Orlando Sentinel that unofficial results are not required to be reported until noon on Friday, and official results are due on Sept. 12.

§ Voters in King County, Wash. will elect whether or not to elect elections officials beginning with the November 2009 election. Got that? To clarify, according to an article in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, the King County Council recently approved a measure that would alter the county charter to allow for the election of the county’s top elections official — like all other 38 counties in Washington — instead of that position being appointed as it is now by the county executive. The decision comes at the behest of two committees appointed to review the disastrous 2004 election in King County. The committees—one appointed by the county executive and the other by the Council—recommended electing the director to increase the accountability of the office. Not everyone is happy with the idea though. “Our elections director should be focused on running elections for all of us and not on winning elections for themselves,” Councilman Larry Phillips told the Post-Intelligencer.

III. Opinion This Week

National: Accurate Vote Counts
Iowa: Email Voting
Florida: Voting Counting, Paper Trails, Local Elections, Voter Registration, II, Civic Responsibility, Touch-Screen Machines
New York: Accessibility
Ohio: Poll Workers
Washington: Election Administration Staffing

Some sites require registration

*********